I was reading an OT’s blog on her thoughts about the Cervical Spine: http://occupationaltherapist.com/blog/annie/?p=57 with some amusement and concern.
I’ve been keeping in touch with rehabilitation issues for over 35 years. PT’s vs. DC’s. - Physiatrists vs. PTs. - ATC’s vs. PTs. - Nurses vs. PTs in home care, and of course OTs vs. PTs. Well, you know, it’s all about turf more than skill, medicine, or rehabilitation. Of all the state and federal laws I have watched in combat with my state and national associations, it never really comes down to Health alone. There’s good and bad everything; not to sound like Donald Rumsfeld, but there are good good professionals and bad bad professionals, there are good professional professionals and bad non-professional professionals.
I want to thank Annie, the OT, for bringing this up.
So how about this OT-PT issue. For perspective, can we even define the terms “adjustment”, “manipulation”, and “mobilization” based on osteopathic, chiropractic, and PT/OT definition of terms? The professions are still suing each other, in almost every state no less, (since it is state practice act laws not federal practice act laws to decide) and no doubt lots of hard earned professional association dues going into them.
Heck, the physical therapy profession can’t even decide if there are 3 or 4 mobilization grades (plus manipulation - grade 5?). What is a certified manual therapist (CMT), orthopedic manual therapist (OMT), certified orthopedic manual therapist (COMT), fellow of the American Association of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapists (FAAOMPT), Rocabado Certified Manual Therapist (RCMT), Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy® (MDT Cert), Maitland Certified Manual Therapist (MCMT) and many more?
All professions have “doctors” PhD’s, DEd’s, DSc’s, MD’s, DPT’s, OTD’s, DO’s DC’s, DPM’s, OD’s; and not one of those degreed professions can argue infallibility in degree bestowing. (Don’t get me started on Harvard MBA’s.)
Not to make light of the extra schooling (classroom and clinic/practical) necessary to assume responsibility for a person’s neck, but let’s face it, many practitioners “lose it” (competency) after a while. At least many states are making “some” if only minimal headway in legally enforcing higher practitioner standards through CEU’s.
No one should perform a procedure (even on a car engine) if they don’t know what they are doing. Ditto the human body. Let’s be honest. In our clinics or at bedside some of our “colleagues” should leave well (pun intended) enough alone. I see it regularly, yet we can hide in the licensing acts where “best practice” is not a law; albeit a safe standard and perhaps malpractice proof. We have the un-attending insurance company “authorization police” determining medical necessity from within their patient absent vacuum.
I can see how CHT may pertain only to the wrist and hand. Or does it include the elbow? The shoulder? Well, excerpting from the Hand Therapy Certification Commission (HTCC) web site http://www.htcc.org/about/index.cfm :

In fact OTs and PT’s treat hands every day whether CHT or not. I certainly am one who encourages practitioners to have certifiable certifications by valid accrediting bodies. I’m certified and recertified in orthopedics by the APTA Board of Specialties.
OT’s are allowed by law in New Jersey (and many other states) to treat the upper extremity regardless of CHT guidelines. One could not fulfill the law unless it is so; as stated in the NJ practice act: http://www1.aota.org/state_law/lawprofile.asp?QStatus=Y&ST=Y “purposeful, task-oriented activities for the client to improve, restore and/or maintain optimal performance of life skills roles and functions including work, recreation, leisure skills and activities of daily living; ”
So I wonder why the OT profession has not sought to also include the cervical spine insofar as it pertains to UE function as part of the upper quarter. Certainly to screen the shoulder it is de rigueur to include the upper quarter and hence the cervical spine. With weakness (radiculopathy) one’s “functions including work, recreation, leisure skills and activities of daily living” would require knowing something about that. If I may be so brash as to suggest many professionals, licensed to treat the cervical spine, have regularly missed at least one important symptom of a patient’s complaint (in the history or physical exam) before the patient is referred to Suburban.
I am confident a random check of many providers would not pass nerve root testing of the upper extremity, even if covered in their formal education. Therefore it is about what a profession is trained to do and what measure(s) can be taken to ensure competence. This of course gets a little sticky with OT perhaps because we all know the neck bone’s connected to the back bone.
In my practice, I am the “enforcer-decider” about qualifications of those who work for me and in that way I represent the professions check and balance for best practice. It began the day I left Columbia University in 1973. To survive, private rehabilitation clinics are often forced into rehabilitation niches. In addition to consulting the Healthy People 2010 goals http://www.healthypeople.gov/lhi, I have been able to add Pediatrics and Vestibular therapy and I have also hired an Occupational Therapist who brings not only the usual OT talents to Suburban, but also Hippo Therapy. I try to keep OT-PT issues in perspective.